 |
Cynthia Hooper
2005
work >>
earlier
work >>
artists
resume>>
My intricate landscape paintings and drawings
examine those marginal or provisional places usually designated
for bland functionality or cast-about accumulation. Such sites include
the environments around industrial zones, vacant lots, and landfills.
These ubiquitous and often unassuming sites generate many formal
and conceptual contradictionsthe familiar dialectic between
the natural and the manufactured, for example, or between the intentional
and the entropic. Places like these also provide discrete refuge
for our cultures myriad infrastructural systems, but when
happened upon, can also generate a subtle anxiety about the safety
and veracity of those systems. Ubiquitous cylindrical storage tanks,
for example, can be elegantly attenuated and even archetypalbut
may also enclose mysterious and possibly perilous substances. Industrial
brownfields left to lie fallow, likewise, can be meditative and
eerily uncannybut also noxious sites bereft of beauty and
value.
My interdisciplinary projects similarly examine the interplay between
these sites' peculiar formal appeal and the more concrete complexities
of their social, political, and environmental condition. Unearthing
a site's (sometimes sobering, sometimes amusing, always interesting)
stories make its morphology more comprehensible, and its subtle
details more compelling. Deploying documentary-style photography
and text-based research methods toward this aimsometimes alongside
paintings and drawingsserves also to underscore the dialectic
between the presumed objectivity and "truthfulness" of
photography and the more obvious artifice of hand-made images.
Focusing on these types of places tends to problematize traditionally
held assumptions about landscape and landscape painting in particular.
Although terms like picturesque and sublime have attended the definition
of landscape since the eighteenth century, landscape historian J.B.
Jackson asserts that yet earlier definitions emphasized not the
bucolic beauty of the land, but rather its mediation and control.
Jackson therefore posits a renewed definition for landscape, one
that revisits its distant etymological past: a composition of man-made
or man-modified spaces to serve as infrastructure or background
for our collective existence. My pictures and projects serve in
part to illuminate this assertion.
|